Monday, March 30, 2009
ULA Cafe, Boston
I just discovered it a couple of weeks ago. They also display local artwork on the walls in the cafe, so if integrates our ideas for having a cafe with our idea of using local art.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Meeting Notes - March 23, 2009
Date: Monday, March 23rd, 2009
Attendees: Christine Cousineau, Pete Kane, Sarah Spicer, Susy Jones, Nupur Hiremath
Location: Room 207, Campus Center, Tufts University
Meeting Objectives
- Discuss Mid-Term Presentation
- Improve site design
Meeting Minutes
1. Problems with Site Design Proposed in Mid-term Presentation:
• Building has awkward angles that are not always pedestrian-friendly.
• Entrance to the underground parking lot cuts off access to the building by pedestrians exiting the T station or coming down Medford Street.
• Open space is on the North side of the building which may not get much direct sunlight.
2. Proposed Elements/Features to Incorporate into Site Design:
• Glass fronts and increased transparency to allow people on the sidewalk to see right through the building (not figuratively) – makes for better shopping experience and improves accessibility. An atrium within the building with glass front is one idea. Also, retail space should be 70% transparent.
• Green wall or heat storage “solar” wall, perhaps on the South side?
• Wall with water running down it to mitigate noise from the T.
• Incorporate history of the site into the design, possibly as some sort of exhibit either in the building or near it?
• Adequate access/entry points into the building (stairwells, lobbies, garage entrance, elevators, etc.)
• Break up the linearity of the sidewalk if you can.
• Break up the monotony of the façade on the street side.
• Sidewalk width should be at least 15-20 feet.
• Can look at the zoning code and find out what the lowest (Parking Area: Number of Parking Spaces) ratio is in any distrit of Somerville (even if it’s not ours) and use this ratio for our site.
• Daycare also has a area per child requirement – look this up.
3. Christine’s Suggestions for How To Distribute Uses at this Site (Within and Outside the Building):
• Underground parking garage should have 2 levels.
• Building should be 4 stories.
• Maintain the park parallel to School Street. Park space could also be used as a farmer’s market, as we suggested.
• Allow the building to extend to shelter the park from the noise of the T but make this portion of the building only 2 stories.
• Daycare could be on the 2nd floor with the terrace as the open space for kids.’
• Two cafes – one at either end of the building.
• Two open spaces – one larger one near School Street and one smaller one by the T stop with some outdoor seating for the café at that end of the building.
• Open atrium near garage entrance.
• 2nd, 3rd, and 4th floors could be all office space (except for the Daycare space on the 2nd floor).
4. Things to Do for Final Presentation:
• Present shadow studies (Christine mentioned that these would very useful).
• Dedicate half the presentation to presenting the site design:
(a) Aerial site design view
(b) SketchUp model (optional)
(c) Cross-section of the building along the North-South axis
(d) Cross-section of the building along the East-West axis
• The other half of the presentation can be devoted to explaining how we plan to incorporate LEED-ND principles into our design.
Grocery and Sq. Footage
City Feed, Jamaica Plain (nov 2007)
http://www.jamaicaplaingazette.com/node/2348
“It’s a little more than three times bigger than Boylston Street, but we’re not going to have three times more of everything,” said City Feed owner David Warner in a Gazette interview, explaining he’s shooting for an “airy feel” to the 3,000-square-foot space.
But some improvements will be hot soups and sandwiches on the menu, and some type of seating for up to 18 people along the large front windows.
City Feed prides itself on a local focus, especially targeting pedestrian traffic—what the store’s web site calls the “Ped Set.”
Likewise, the store features local and regional products. That will increase in the new location, including in the bigger fresh produce section, Warner said.
Harvest CoOp, Jamaica Plain and Cambridge (june 2005)
http://www.naturalfoodsmerchandiser.com/tabId/107/itemId/1637/pageId/2/Coop-and-community-a-perfect-match.aspx
It was then that Harvest Co-op cast its eyes towards Jamaica Plain, purchasing a 6,000-square-foot building in the heart of the neighborhood?s central business district. The new co-op opened its doors to the public in May 1999.
The 19,000-square-foot Cambridge location also serves as a community center, hosting free classes, movie screenings and lectures. Recent events included a Russian language class, an afternoon of Japanese anime films and a session focused on how to use herbs in a variety of recipes.
With combined membership for both stores at a robust 5,500, Harvest Co-op is currently in a comfortable place. We’d like to expand to other neighborhoods, like Somerville, which is similar to Jamaica Plain. They don't have a good natural market, says Durkin. But right now we’re just concentrating on doing what it is we do, better.?
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Community Path Funding
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Light-Transmitting Concrete
Monday, March 9, 2009
Amazing green roof in Japan
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Energy Star Focus
Map of Incomes in Somerville
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Green Construction
Monday, March 2, 2009
Meeting Notes - March 2, 2009
Date: Monday, March 2nd, 2009
Attendees: Pete Kane, Sarah Spicer, Susy Jones, Nupur Hiremath
Location: (har har) Dunkin’ Donuts, Davis Square
Meeting Objectives
- Discuss Mid-Term Presentation
Mid-term Presentation Section Outline and Presenter:
1. Presentation Outline
I. Opening - The Site **Pete**
A. Present Boundaries
B. Extended Parcel
II. The Neighborhood **Nupur**
A. History
B. Characteristics/Demographics
C. Project green line extension plans (connection to historical site characteristics) [Note: Pete, in the version you sent us at 7:47pm on 3/2/09 this section is missing].
III. Pros and Cons **Sarah**
A. Present State [Note: Pete, in the version you sent us at 7:47pm on 3/2/09 this section is also repeated in Section II].
B. List of Pros and Cons
IV. Intended Program **Susy**
A. Build Out - Uses
B. Features to be included
C. Intended LEED-ND Items
V. Sketches/Inspiration
A. Rough Sketch (of our proposed site plan) **Sarah**
B. Inspiration images/designs **Pete**
2. Details of Section III: Pros and Cons
Pros
• Proximity to Gilman Square T stop
• Proximity to City Hall, High School, Middle School, Public Library, Senior Center
• Located along a major artery (i.e. Medford Street
• Historical significance of Gilman Square (mixed-use neighborhood serviced by the train)
• Walkable neighborhood (can generate high volume of foot traffic for retail)
• Accessible by proposed community path
Cons
• Poor construction of the Homans building
• Unreliable timeline for Green Line extension project
• Proximity to train tracks (noise and safety issues)
• Reduced accessibility due to location at the bottom of a steep hill
• Possibly a poor choice for retail businesses? [Note: Nupur will research this further]
3. Details of Section IV: Intended Program
Build out/Uses:
• Tear down the Homans building
• Create open/park/garden space
• Locate retail store(s) on the 1st floor
o Grocery store
o Café
o Ethnic restaurants (as it is located in an ethnically diverse neighborhood)
• Locate office/civic space on 2nd floor
o Day care
o Energy or environmental non-profits or small businesses
o Gym (makes sense as the community path will be used by joggers and bicyclists)
o City offices (spill over from City Hall)
o Arts Center
o Community Center
Features:
• Green roof
• Underground parking lot
• Rain garden
• Outdoor seating
• Tiered roof
• Large glass windows on 1st floor
• Well-lit building
• Local artwork on site
• Bike service station (free air)
• Community path [Note: Mention that this is incidental as it is not in our hands].
4. Action Items for Monday, March 9, 2009
# Action (Person responsible)
1 Investigate whether this neighborhood of Somerville is good for retail - Nupur
2 Create a map of landmarks/resources (school, city hall, library, etc. - Susy
3 Look for a map of median incomes in the immediate vicinity of Homans - Nupur
4 Create a rough sketch of our proposed site plan - Sarah
5 Pull together inspiration images - Pete
6 Populate remaining powerpoint slides with info from Sarah/Susy/Nupur - Pete
7 Create a map of land use (residential, civic, retail, etc.) in Homans neighborhood - Susy/Sarah*
*Only if time permits.
Old Gilman Square

Saturday, February 28, 2009
Diagonal Cut into Building Allows Neighborhood Integration
Also, more specifically, the diagonal cut into the building of the Lincoln Center (which, in addition to having that entire diagonal wall made of glass, is a crucial point to making it more inviting to people outside) is exactly what I was imagining we could do with our building at the Homans site. This would: (a) create enough room for the raingarden; (b) allow pedestrians to cut through the triangular area of the plot, passing by the rain garden and the cafe and, perhaps, entice them to come into the building itself. In addition, if we only make the diagonal cut on the first floor of the building and let the second floor of the building maintain a more rectangular form that juts out over the cafe's seating area, it will automatically provide some shade to people in the outdoor area.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
LEED-ND Paper Items
- SLL Credit 3 - Preferred Location
- NPD Credit 2 - Diversity of Uses
- GCT Credit 4 - Building Reuse and Adaptive Reuse
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Community Path

It looks like the community path is going to run along the train tracks. From the schematic in the bottom left corner of this image, it appears that the community path is going to run at a level higher than the rail tracks and slightly lower than ground level.
Source: Friends of the Community Path. http://www.pathfriends.org/scp/
History of Gilman Square
1842-1886
Rich landowners in East Somerville, such as Charles E. Gilman, Oliver Tufts, and Rufus Stickney, subdivided and sold their large tracts of land for residential development in the area that later became Gilman Square [1].
1885-1900
Gilman Square formed the interection of Pearl, Medford and Marshall Streets, developed into a commercial center adjacent to the then Boston and Lowell commuter station. The Boston and Lowell line, constructed in 1835, was the first passenger railway in the state and connected Boston to the Merrimack Valley textile mills [2]. As more residential homes were constructed, a pharmacy, an athletic equipment store, a post office, and a furniture repair shop sprung up in the neighborhood [1].
[Note: The existing commuter train tracks appear to be in the same location as the Boston and Lowell line].
1888
A large granite station was constructed on the south side of the train tracks [1].
[Note: The station used to be where the NSTAR service boxes are currently located].
1890
As the community grew, a three-story building called the Citizen Building, which housed offices of a local newspaper, the Somerville Citizen, and the Grand Army of the Republic Hall, was built at the intersection of Medford and Pearl Streets [1].
[Note: This building was later razed down].
1895
The Signet Commandery Building was built at 341 Medford Street [1].
[Note: This is the historic building across the street from the Homans Building].
1940
The commuter rail service was discontinued and the Boston and Lowell station was removed [1].
Sources:
(1) Zellie, C. 1990. Beyond the Neck: The Architecture and Development of Somerville, Massachusetts. St. Paul, Minnsota: Landscape Research.
(2) Binford, H. C. 1985. The First Suburbs: Residential Communities on the Boston Periphery, 1815-1860. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
Site Visit Photos
Zoning Restrictions
Monday, February 16, 2009
Mixed-Use, Transit-Oriented Examples
- The Burnside Rocket - Portland, Oregon click here.
The exterior aesthetic reminds me of the triple-deckers throughout Somerville. May be a nice application for neighborhood consistency. - Trolley Square - Cambridge, Massachusetts click here.
Local example of mixed use, affordable housing, and green design. - Placentia-Westgate - Placentia, California click here.
Nice example of reuse into mixed-use with attention to walkability and streetscape. - Hillsboro, Oregon click here.
Mixed use transit development. Great street facades. - Eastworks - Easthampton, MA click here.
This project is in my hometown. Its a reuse of an old industrial building redone for mixed use retail and residential. Highly successful, though not transit oriented. Our project is not as large but worth looking at.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Public Transport Dependence near Homans Building Site

Source: City of Somerville (Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development). 2008. Consolidated Plan 2008-2013 - Section 12: Appendices and Maps. Available online at: http://www.somervillema.gov/aud3.cfm?aud=res&cat=Con%20Plan&instance_id=67. Accessed on February 15, 2009.
Homans Building Views from Google Maps
(a)

View of the northwest corner of the Homans Building site from Medford Street Surroundings include 2 gas stations (one abutting the site and one across the street) and a predominantly residential neighborhood.
(b)

View of the southeast corner of the Homans Building site from Medford Street with a parking lot flanked by Medford Street, the train tracks, and the building itself.
(c)

View of the rear of the Homans Building Site from the School Street bridge that passes over the train tracks behind the site.
Source: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=350+Medford+St,+Somerville,+MA+02145&sll=42.368835,-71.082061&sspn=0.010653,0.027895&g=101+Sciarappa+St,+Cambridge,+MA+02141&ie=UTF8&z=16&iwloc=addr
Green Line Extension
Proposed Green Line Extension includes stations at the following locations: Union Square, Innerbelt/Brickbottom, Washington Street, Gilman Square, Lowell Street, Ball Square, College Avenue, Winthrop Street, and Mystic Valley Parkway/Rte 16.
Source: http://www.greenlineextension.org/img_SlideView.asp?GID=3448&GroupID=11903&reccount=1&maxrec=0&View=&Expanded=&Image=3448Accessibility of Gilman Square Station for Pedestrians, Cars, and Abutters
Comments from the Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development sent to the Executive Office of Transportation on September 12, 2008 read as follows:
- "Homan's Building - This building represents a key a development site for the City of Somerville and only the absolute minimum area should be taken as part of the Extension project, if anything is needed. The parking lot also needs to be preserved for the building.
- Kiss and Ride - No rider parking or Kiss and Ride should be included at this location.
- Size and Elevation - This station seems significantly larger than shown at other locations. The only entrance should be at the upper level off of Medford Street and not from the parking lot for the Homan's Building since this will be a development site.
- Connection With High School and Community Path - We believe that direct access to the platform should be provided from the Community Path and Somerville High School because Medford Street access alone will not be sufficient for the key potential rider groups. High School students will be one of the key user groups for this station and their paths should be carefully considered in the planning effort to make sure they do not develop cut-through paths that are contrary to safety at this location.
- School Street - Allowing direct access from School Street should be considered."
The Board of Aldermen seem to have included these comments in a presentation made on 17 September, 2008:
- No Kiss & Ride or Commuter Parking
- Needs Adequate Bus, Bike and Pedestrian Access and Circulation
- Preservation of Holman Property for Future Development
- Direct Access from High School, Community Path and School Street
Homans Building - Green Design Feasibility Study
Project Overview from the website of the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative which seems to have awarded a $20,000 grant to the City of Somerville to conduct this feasibility study:
"When planning the conversion of three former warehouse buildings into offices, the City of Somerville did a feasibility study analyzing the potential use of building-integrated photovoltaics and related energy efficiency measures including heating and cooling design, and daylighting techniques. Through its feasibility study grant, the city analyzed the potential use of building-integrated photovoltaics and related energy efficiency measures including heating and cooling design, and daylighting techniques. The study is valuable in its analysis of renewables and energy efficiency in large-scale renovation projects."
Source: http://www.masstech.org/project_detail.cfm?ProjSeq=408
History of the Homans Building Renovation
1998 (1)
- The City of Somerville purchased the Homans building for $1.2 million several years ago during the Capuano administration for use as a community/youth center (2).
- At the time, the first floor was being used for storage of surplus furniture and equipment; the second and third floors were lying empty (2).
- The Gay administration proposed that the building be rehabilitated into office space for city and school departments currently housed in the city-owned City Hall Annex, and in rented space at the Tufts Administration Building (TAB) on Holland Street (the former Western Junior High School) and the Boys and Girls Club on Washington Street (the former Pope School) (2).
- The Gay administration proposed that the building be rehabilitated into office space for city and school departments currently housed in the city-owned City Hall Annex, and in rented space at the Tufts Administration Building (TAB) on Holland Street (the former Western Junior High School) and the Boys and Girls Club on Washington Street (the former Pope School) (2).
- The City, with approval from the Board of Aldermen, designed a proposal to tear down several later additions to the building, mostly enclosed loading docks, and rehabilitate the original structure, which comprises approximately 43,000 square feet of space (2).
- The Council on Aging and Health Department was to be moved to the ground floor, and put on the second floor the other city departments presently housed at the City Hall Annex on Evergreen Avenue. The School Department would like to move its administrative offices to the third floor. It is claimed that the demolition of the additions to the building would yield enough open space to create 110 parking spaces (2).
- As the estimated cost of the project rose from $5 million to $9 million, the Board of Aldermen voted to authorize the issuance of bonds to raise for the approximately $7.5 million needed for the renovation project. The Board of Aldermen's analysis showed that the plan was financially feasible if it proceeded along a tight time schedule (2).
- While some design work was done, the project was not otherwise commenced during the Gay administration (2). The Curtatone committee agreed with the goal of consolidating scattered municipal offices into a single location but found the actual Homans building insufficient to deliver fully on this promise (1).
- The project failed to meet its timeline in the months after the Board of Aldermen voted conditionally to approve the bond authorization for the project (2).
- One of the Board's conditions was the creation of a Municipal Property Review Committee to craft a long-term facilities plan for the city which, ironically, recommended that the Homans project be abandoned, and that the municipal departments be instead re-located into the Powderhouse School (2).
- According to the committee, the Powder House School has more than double the usable square footage of the Homans Building, would be less expensive to renovate, is more conveniently located, and is already equipped with needed communications infrastructure. Construction costs were estimated to be approximately $63 per square foot in the Powder House, as opposed to $185 for the Homans project (1).
- The committee estimated the city would save more than $12 million over 20 years if it moved city offices into the school, as opposed to the $4.9 million savings projected by renovating the Homans building (1).
Sources:
(1) City of Somerville. 2004. “Curtatone Committee Puts Homans Renovation on Hold.” March 29, 2004 Press Release. Available online at: http://www.somervillema.gov/newsDetail.cfm?instance_id=171. Accessed February 15, 2009.
(2) Provost, D. 2006. “City of Somerville as a Developer: Homans Building.” What is Happening in Somerville? Available online at: <http://www.provost-citywide.org/what.html. Accessed February 15>, 2009. PERSONAL WEBPAGE - NOT A RELIABLE SOURCE.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Google Earth Shots
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Report Organization
Title of the report, graphic illustration, authors, department, date.
Chapter headings and subheadings.
The more detailed, the better: a Table of Contents should reveal the structure of the report.
Maps, site plans, historic views, charts (pie or graph) and numerical tables.
Photos throughout the report should have captions (should tell a story) but need to be listed here.
Summary of major findings and recommendations. No more than two pages.
Gets written at the end, after the report is complete. Can be in paragraph or bullet format.
Group project members, site names and location, contact person, purpose of the project.
If applicable, short history of the site and past planning studies.
Site location, history (only what supports your proposal), current uses, surrounding uses.
Characteristics, both positive and negative, of access, circulation, uses, image, character, districts, edges, nodes, landmarks
- Urban Design Analysis - issues map (plan of site w/ graphics to point out pros & cons)
- Challenges - problems with existing conditions, past barriers to planning improvements, constituency or neighborhood issues, ownership issues
- Opportunities - qualities of existing conditions, potential, changing trends
NOT NECESSARY
For UEP 294, this is mostly a design analysis, with the addition of the first bullet, if performed.
For full urban design and planning group projects, this section would include some or all of the following.
- Interviews of resource people - what has been said, proposed and done about the site; what is the vision of the city or other constituency for this site
- Resident survey - to gather input from residents, opinions about current issues and potential futures of the site
- Shoppers survey - used to determine what's missing
- Market analysis - findings from previous studies in past 5 years (no time to do a real one)
From the findings of your observation and the results of your analysis, develop the urban design principles that should guide future development of the site.
- Urban Design Principles - guiding rules for the desired height, massing, setbacks, streetwall, and architectural character of the built environment; desired characteristics of the open spaces and pedestrian environment environment; relationships between built and open space; relationships between uses, private and public spaces
- LEED-ND Criteria - the criteria you have chosen to focus on. Evaluation of the points earned and level of certification achieved.
Program of Uses - a chart of the quantity (square feet, number, units, spaces) and location (building, floor level) of different land uses on the site
- Housing (number and type of units) - 1,000 SF typical
- Retail, office, institutional space (gross square feet GSF)
- Parking (number of spaces) - space and space of circulation - 300 SF/car
- Open spaces (type, GSF)
- Public realm elements (streets, sidewalks, streetscape)
What would you tell the architects you want to see on the site.
- Proposed design - a description/explanation of the design that houses the program. This can be a conceptual design for the site, showing one possible application of the urban design principles, with a detailed design of a section or component, such as streetscape elements, or it can be complete design of the whole site.
- A site plan showing roofs of buildings and circulation paths, courtyards and buildings.
- A section through the site showing changes in grade, streetscape elements, heights and shapes of buildings
- On the plan and in the text, identifying parts of the site by name (northwest corner, main entrance, etc.) and if there are several buildings, identify each building by name, letter or number.
- One good way of describing a design is to describe the experience of someone walking through the site, going through several spaces and activities in sequence. Maybe a scenario based on demographic.
- Describe the desired sense of place desired to be achieved.
An outline of the steps that could be taken to implement the plan. This can be:
- an action plan, with most visible actions first, to build support for future steps, OR
- a chronological plan: what needs to be done first to unlock the potential of the rest.






